Confe­rence Program: “The Future of the Antique”

4. November 2025

The Future of the Antique: Inter­pre­ting the Sculp­tural Canon

Tickets for this confe­rence can be booked here.

Insti­tute of Clas­sical Studies & Warburg Insti­tute (School of Advanced Study, Univer­sity of London) 

1012 December 2025

This confe­rence marks the publi­ca­tion of the new, expanded edition of Francis Haskell and Nicholas Penny’s seminal Taste and the Antique (3 vols, Harvey Miller/Brepols, 2024).

The original edition was a land­mark study that estab­lished a cano­nical list of ninety-five ancient sculp­tures that were widely admired, coll­ected, and copied between c. 1500 and 1900. It traced how these works—from the Apollo Belve­dere to the Farnese Bull—shaped artistic taste, coll­ec­ting prac­tices, and artistic discourse by defi­ning a clas­sical aesthetic and pedagogy. As one of the most influ­en­tial texts in the history of art history, Taste and the Antique has profoundly shaped scho­lar­ship and cura­to­rial prac­tice on the recep­tion of ancient sculpture.

The revised three-volume edition of 2024 substan­ti­ally updates the original text with recent rese­arch. It broa­dens the discus­sion of the recep­tion of the clas­sical canon, incor­po­rates decades of inter­vening scho­lar­ship, and brings the conver­sa­tion into the realm of contem­po­rary art, opening new perspec­tives on the after­lives of Greek and Roman sculpture.

Taking the new edition as a point of depar­ture, the confe­rence assesses the state of the field, explores emer­ging metho­do­lo­gies, and considers future directions.

Sessions will address how clas­sical statues shaped visual culture beyond repli­ca­tion, including:

  • SHAPING AND TRANS­MIT­TING THE CANON: Exami­ning the estab­lish­ment, radical altera­tion, and disso­lu­tion of the sculp­tural canon in the early modern era.
  • THE CANON AND THE BODY IN THE AGE OF EMPIRE: Explo­ring the role of clas­sical statuary in the concep­tion of “propor­tio­nate” and “dispro­por­tio­nate” bodies, in the repre­sen­ta­tion of non-Euro­pean popu­la­tions, and in colo­nial educa­tional and social policies.
  • RESTO­RA­TION AND DISPLAY: Conside­ring recon­fi­gu­ra­tions of the antique and notions of authen­ti­city; situa­ting the antique within modern museum contexts.
  • CHAN­GING AND RETHIN­KING CANONS: Rethin­king the antique within modern and post­mo­dern theo­re­tical frame­works and practices.

A core aim of this event is to foster dialogue across gene­ra­tions, tradi­tions, and metho­do­lo­gies of scholarship.

Orga­nised by Adriano Aymo­nino (Univer­sity of Buck­ingham) & Kath­leen Chris­tian (Census of Antique Works of Art and Archi­tec­ture Known in the Renais­sance, Humboldt Univer­sity of Berlin)                                                                                                                          

 

PROGRAMME

Wednesday 10 December (Insti­tute of Clas­sical Studies – Senate House – Beve­ridge Hall)

18:00: Doors open

18:20: Kathe­rine Harloe (Director, Insti­tute of Clas­sical Studies), introducing:

18:3019:30: Salva­tore Settis (Acca­de­mico dei Lincei)

Keynote paper: Only Connect: Dionysus and Christ

 

Day 1: Thursday 11 December (Insti­tute of Clas­sical Studies – Senate House – Beve­ridge Hall)

 MORNING

10:00: Regis­tra­tion

10:30: Welcome and Introduction

Adriano Aymo­nino and Kath­leen Christian

 

SESSION 1: SHAPING AND TRANS­MIT­TING THE CANON

Chair: Kathe­rine Harloe (Director, Insti­tute of Clas­sical Studies)

10:45: Katha­rina Beden­bender (Institut für Kunst- und Bild­ge­schichte, Humboldt-Univer­sität zu Berlin)

An Anti­quity of Plants and Animals? Towards a Non-Human Canon

11:05: Clare Hornsby (British School at Rome – The Walpole Society)

Pira­nesi and the Clas­sical Body 

11:25: Vivien Bird (Univer­sity of Buckingham)

Art, Histo­rio­graphy and Connois­seur­ship: The Speci­mens of Antient Sculp­ture (1809)

11:45: Discus­sion

 

12:00: LUNCH BREAK (lunch provided for spea­kers only)

 

AFTER­NOON

SESSION 2: THE CANON AND THE BODY IN THE AGE OF EMPIRE

Chair: Caro­line Vout (Professor of Clas­sics — Director of the Museum of Clas­sical Archaeo­logy, Univer­sity of Cambridge)

14:00: Annette Kranen (Institut für Kunst­ge­schichte, Univer­sität Bern)

Living Anti­qui­ties? Anthropological/Travel Imagery and the Sculp­tural Canon in the Late Eigh­te­enth Century

14:20: Eva Ehninger (Institut für Kunst- und Bild­ge­schichte, Humboldt-Univer­sität zu Berlin)

The Bodies of Gods. Drawing from the Antique in Colo­nial India

14:40: Anna Degler (Kunst­his­to­ri­sches Institut, Freie Univer­sität Berlin)

A Black Apollo? John Quincy Adams Ward’s The Freedman and the Belve­dere Torso

15:00: Rebecca Yuste (Depart­ment of Art History & Archaeo­logy, Columbia University)

Between Plaster and Stone: Reframing the Clas­sical Canon in Bourbon New Spain

15:20: Discus­sion

15:35: TEA/COFFEE BREAK (for all attendees)

16:05: Kath­leen Chris­tian (Census of Antique Works of Art and Archi­tec­ture Known in the Renais­sance, Institut für Kunst- und Bild­ge­schichte, Humboldt-Univer­sität zu Berlin)

Intro­du­cing the Updated Census

16:25: Adriano Aymo­nino (Depart­ment of History and History of Art, Univer­sity of Buck­ingham) and Eloisa Dodero (Capi­to­line Museums, Rome)

Intro­du­cing the New Edition of Haskell and Penny, Taste and the Antique

16:45: Discus­sion

17:00: Bill Sherman (Director, Warburg Insti­tute), intro­du­cing: 

17:10: Nicholas Penny (Former Director, National Gallery, London)

Keynote paper: The Inven­tion of the Classical

18:30: End of Day One

 

Day 2: Friday 12 December (Warburg Insti­tute – Lecture Hall)

MORNING

10:00: Regis­tra­tion

10:30: Welcome and Introduction

Adriano Aymo­nino and Kath­leen Christian

 

SESSION 3: RESTO­RA­TION AND DISPLAY

Chair: Chiara Piva (Profes­so­ressa Asso­ciata, Sapi­enza Univer­sità di Roma)

10:45: Jeffrey Collins (Bard Graduate Center)

Zooming In: The Social Lives of Statues 

11:05: Eliza­beth Bartman (Former Presi­dent of the Archaeo­lo­gical Insti­tute of America)

Zooming Out: Resto­ra­tion as Taste 

11:25: Astrid Fendt (Landes­mu­seum Würt­tem­berg, Stuttgart)

Resto­ra­tion, De- and Re-resto­ra­tion of Ancient Sculp­tures in the Munich Glyp­to­thek, Nine­te­enth to Twenty-First Century

 

11:45: TEA/COFFEE BREAK (for all attendees)

 

12:15: Eleo­nora Ferrazza (Depart­ment of Greek and Roman Anti­qui­ties, Vatican Museums) & Claudia Valeri (Depart­ment of Greek and Roman Anti­qui­ties, Vatican Museums)

The Braccio Nuovo in the Vatican Museums: Display and Resto­ra­tions of the Antique in the Nine­te­enth Century 

12:45: Lisa Ayla Çakmak (Depart­ment of Arts of Greece, Rome, and Byzan­tium, Art Insti­tute of Chicago) & Katha­rine A. Raff (Depart­ment of Arts of Greece, Rome, and Byzan­tium, Art Insti­tute of Chicago)

Reve­aling Resto­ra­tions: Asses­sing the Presen­ta­tion and Recep­tion of Restored Roman Sculp­tures from the Torlonia Coll­ec­tion at the Art Insti­tute of Chicago 

13:15: Discus­sion

 

13:30: LUNCH BREAK (lunch provided for spea­kers only)

 

AFTER­NOON

SESSION 4: CHAN­GING AND RETHIN­KING CANONS

Chair: Flora Dennis (Warburg Insti­tute)

15:00: Joanna Fiduccia (Depart­ment of the History of Art, Yale University)

The Head of an Etru­scan: Alter­na­tive Anti­qui­ties and the Physio­gno­mies of Modern Sculpture

15:20: Domi­ziana Serrano (Institut ARTS, Univer­sité Jean Monnet – Saint-Étienne)

The Frag­mented Marble Body: Surrea­lism, Poli­tical Phan­toms, and the Canon Recast

15:40: Tilman Schreiber (Depart­ment of Art History and Film Studies – Fried­rich Schiller Univer­sity Jena)

From the Cortile to the Cosmos: Inter­pre­ting the Sculp­tural Canon in the Context of US Space Travel

16:00: Discus­sion

 

16:15: TEA/COFFEE BREAK (for all attendees)

 

CLOSING PAPER: HISTO­RIO­GRA­PHIC PERSPEC­TIVES ON THE CANON

16:45: Mateusz Kapustka (Art History Insti­tute – Univer­sity of Zurich)

Fear Reve­aled: Jacob Burck­hardt on Clas­sical Anthro­po­mor­phism and Demonic Hybridity

17:05: Final Remarks

17:15: End of Day Two

 

Biogra­phies and Abstracts

ADRIANO AYMO­NINO (Univer­sity of Buckingham) 

Bio: Dr Adriano Aymo­nino is Senior Lecturer and Director of the MA in Art Market and the History of Coll­ec­ting at the Univer­sity of Buck­ingham. His publi­ca­tions include Drawn from the Antique: Artists and the Clas­sical Ideal (Sir John Soane’s Museum, 2015); Enligh­tened Eclec­ti­cism (PMC for Yale Univer­sity Press, 2021—winner of the 2022 Berger Prize for British Art History) and a revised and updated edition of Francis Haskell and Nicholas Penny’s Taste and the Antique (Harvey Miller, 3 vols, 2024). He is curr­ently working on a book for the Burlington Maga­zine Press: Paper Stones: Lithic Repre­sen­ta­tions in the Age of the Grand Tour.

Abstract, Intro­du­cing the New Edition of Haskell and Penny, Taste and the Antique

Taste and the Antique. The Lure of Clas­sical Sculp­ture: 15001900, published in 1981 by Francis Haskell and Nicholas Penny, offered for the first time to specia­lists and the general public an acces­sible intro­duc­tion to the enormous impact that ancient sculp­ture has had on Western visual arts and culture for nearly four centu­ries. Over the past four decades, the book’s intro­duc­tory essay and the 95 cata­logue entries that follow have become a classic of art history, indis­pensable for anyone studying the recep­tion of the clas­sical tradi­tion, the history of taste and coll­ec­ting, and the cano­nical models of Western figu­ra­tive imagi­na­tion. This talk will intro­duce a new, revised and expanded edition of Taste and the Antique, published in three volumes in December 2024, discuss the new features compared to the first edition, and assess the current state of rese­arch, as well as future perspectives.

 

ELIZA­BETH BARTMAN (Former Presi­dent of the Archaeo­lo­gical Insti­tute of America)

Bio:  Eliza­beth Bartman is a Rese­arch Affi­liate at the Insti­tute for the Study of the Ancient World at New York Univer­sity. The author of several books on ancient Roman sculp­ture, she is curr­ently inves­ti­ga­ting the early-modern resto­ra­tion of ancient marbles, work that will be published as a mono­graph (with Jeffrey Collins) on the Capitoline’s Red Faun as well as a book-length intro­duc­tion speci­fi­cally intended for archaeologists.

Abstract, Zooming Out: Resto­ra­tion as Taste

Haskell and Penny’s ground-brea­king Taste and the Antique paid scant atten­tion to resto­ra­tion, a short­co­ming reme­died in the new and expanded edition. The 95 cata­logue entries now list the physical inter­ven­tions and addi­tions that virtually all the sculp­tures have had, while in many cases archival docu­ments and early drawings further docu­ment the resto­ra­tion process. Toge­ther, this new infor­ma­tion permits us to consider how resto­ra­tion itself is a mani­fes­ta­tion of “taste and the antique.” Precisely because the objects Haskell and Penny selected were among the most admired between 1500 and 1900, the heyday of resto­ra­tion, their corpus provides the ideal starting point for studying the ways not only resto­rers but also dealers and coll­ec­tors imposed their own, “contem­po­rary” visions of anti­quity on broken fragments.

As tastes changed, so too did the anti­qui­ties’ physical form, with many under­going multiple “updates” to conform with current aesthe­tics and/or anti­qua­rian science.

 

KATHA­RINA BEDEN­BENDER (Institut für Kunst- und Bild­ge­schichte, Humboldt-Univer­sität zu Berlin)

Bio: Katha­rina Beden­bender completed her PhD on ‘Stairs and Cere­mo­nies in Early Modern Venice’ in 2019. She held doctoral scho­lar­ships at the Centro Tedesco di Studi Vene­ziani and the Biblio­theca Hertziana in Rome, where she subse­quently worked as a post­doc­toral rese­arch assistant. Since 2021, she has been a rese­arch assistant at the IKB and Census (Humboldt Univer­sity, Berlin), working on her Habi­li­ta­tion thesis “Before Ecology: Non-human Animals and Plants in Early Modern Italy”.

Abstract, An Anti­quity of Plants and Animals? Towards a Non-Human Canon

This paper discusses the anthro­po­cen­tric focus of the sculp­tural canon in the early modern era by focu­sing on one of the few antique animal sculp­tures included in Haskell and Penny’s Taste and the Antique: the Wild Boar gifted to Cosimo I de’ Medici in 1560. In 1612, Cosimo II commis­sioned Pietro Tacca to create a bronze copy, which was later trans­formed by Fran­cesco II into a bronze foun­tain sculp­ture for the Mercato Nuovo. Tacca added a bronze base, forming a basin covered with an ecosystem of plants and small animals remi­nis­cent of life casts. While Kris (1926) asso­ciated the style rustique with a late Cinque­cento para­digm shift away from the autho­rity of anti­quity towards a ‘natu­ra­lism’ based on field studies—the bronze foun­tain sculp­ture brings toge­ther suppo­sedly contra­dic­tory strands of artistic produc­tion. This will be discussed in rela­tion to Fran­cesco II’s inte­rest in the natural world.

 

VIVIEN BIRD (Univer­sity of Buckingham)

Bio: Vivien Bird is a PhD candi­date at the Univer­sity of Buck­ingham, where she rese­ar­ches the coll­ec­ting and scho­larly acti­vi­ties of the anti­qua­rian, clas­sical scholar, numis­ma­tist and art connois­seur Richard Payne Knight (1751–1824). She was the Anne Chris­to­pherson Fellow in the British Museum’s Depart­ment of Prints and Drawings in 2018. Her rese­arch to date has been supported by the Francis Haskell Memo­rial Fund and the Royal Numis­matic Society John Casey Fund.

Abstract: Art, Histo­rio­graphy and Connois­seur­ship: The Speci­mens of Antient Sculp­ture (1809)

This paper discusses the “taste for the antique” in Britain during the period Adolf Michaelis described as “the golden age of clas­sical dilet­tan­tism”, namely the late eigh­te­enth and early nine­te­enth centu­ries. The period was marked by the forma­tion of signi­fi­cant coll­ec­tions of ancient art, as well as coll­ec­tions of marble replicas and plaster casts of iconic sculp­tures. It was also a period that saw an increased inte­rest in the art, culture and lite­ra­ture of Greece as opposed to Rome, and the begin­nings of a “modern outlook” on Greek and Roman art.

Whilst such deve­lo­p­ments – as well as the arrival of Phiga­leian and Parthenon marbles in London – did not imme­dia­tely alter the status of estab­lished cano­nical sculp­tures, they were mani­fested in contem­po­rary discourse on taste and in some publi­ca­tions on ancient art.

These include the two volumes of the Society of Dilettanti’s Speci­mens of Antient Sculp­ture (1809, 1835). The text for the first volume was provided by the art connois­seur, clas­sical scholar and coll­ector Richard Payne Knight (1751–1824). The paper will examine how the discus­sion and repre­sen­ta­tion of clas­sical sculp­ture, as well as refe­rences to an estab­lished canon, in this volume are sympto­matic of an epochal shift in the study and recep­tion of clas­sical art.

 

LISA AYLA ÇAKMAK (Depart­ment of Arts of Greece, Rome, and Byzan­tium, Art Insti­tute of Chicago)

Bio: Lisa Ayla Çakmak is Mary and Michael Jaharis Chair and Curator, Arts of Greece, Rome, and Byzan­tium, at the Art Insti­tute of Chicago. She recently led a reinstal­la­tion of the Art Institute’s perma­nent coll­ec­tion galle­ries and colla­bo­rated with artist Charles Ray on the instal­la­tion of A copy of ten marble frag­ments of the Great Eleu­si­nian Relief (2017) in those same galle­ries. She is a Martha Sharp Joukowsky lecturer for the Archaeo­lo­gical Insti­tute of America for 2025–2026.

Abstract, Reve­aling Resto­ra­tions: Asses­sing the Presen­ta­tion and Recep­tion of Restored Roman Sculp­tures from the Torlonia Coll­ec­tion at the Art Insti­tute of Chicago

In this paper, we address how the recent exhi­bi­tion of a selec­tion of fifty-eight ancient sculp­tures from the Torlonia Coll­ec­tion has radi­cally changed the way that we, as scho­lars of Greek and Roman art, have come to under­stand, inter­pret, and present later historic resto­ra­tions in museum settings. To unders­core the role of these resto­ra­tions in alte­ring the appearance of the ancient sculp­ture (or frag­ment of a sculp­ture), working in consul­ta­tion and colla­bo­ra­tion with the Torlonia Foun­da­tion, we included a conser­va­tion diagram for every object on display in the exhi­bi­tion. These diagrams effi­ci­ently and clearly illus­trated both the ancient and restored parts of each object in a format acces­sible to general audi­ences. The inclu­sion of the diagrams both promoted visi­tors’ close looking and enga­ge­ment with the objects and shaped how we as scho­lars talk about, present, and evaluate ancient Roman sculp­tures within the context of major public art museums.

 

KATH­LEEN CHRIS­TIAN (Institut für Kunst- und Bild­ge­schichte, Humboldt-Univer­sität zu Berlin)

Bio: Since 2020 Kath­leen Chris­tian has been Professor of Early Modern Art at Humboldt-Univer­sität zu Berlin and Director of the Census of Antique Works of Art and Archi­tec­ture Known in the Renais­sance. Her rese­arch focuses on the recep­tion of anti­quity, parti­cu­larly in Renais­sance Rome, and the coll­ec­ting and display of sculp­ture. She is the author of Empire without End: Anti­qui­ties Coll­ec­tions in Renais­sance Rome, c. 13501527 and, most recently, Raffaele Riario, Jacopo Galli, and Michelangelo’s Bacchus, 1471–1572, released by Harvey Miller Press in September, 2025. Toge­ther with Cammy Brot­hers, she co-edits the Harvey Miller book series All’an­tica.

Abstract, Intro­du­cing the Updated Census

Now in its seventy-sixth year, the Census of Antique Works of Art and Archi­tec­ture Known in the Renais­sance (https://database.census.de) has recently entered a new phase. This paper pres­ents the database’s rede­si­gned inter­face and recent upgrades. It high­lights steps taken to align the Census with inter­ope­rable cultural-heri­tage stan­dards. Conside­ring shifts in approach and the launch of the new book series All’an­tica, it explores how new colla­bo­ra­tions, metho­do­lo­gies, and tech­no­lo­gies can help to reframe long-stan­ding rese­arch ques­tions in clas­sical reception.

 

JEFFREY COLLINS (Bard Graduate Center) 

Bio: Jeffrey Collins is Professor of Art History and Mate­rial Culture at Bard Graduate Center, where he specia­lizes in seven­te­enth- and eigh­te­enth-century Europe. He is the author of Papacy and Poli­tics in Eigh­te­enth-Century Rome: Pius VI and the Arts (Cambridge 2004) and a prin­cipal contri­butor to History of Design: Deco­ra­tive Arts and Mate­rial Culture, 14002000 (New Haven 2013). A fellow of the American Academy in Rome, he has published on archi­tec­ture, urba­nism, pain­ting, sculp­ture, book illus­tra­tion, museo­logy, metal­work, furni­ture, and film. His current project, with Eliza­beth Bartman, revi­sits the chan­ging form and meanings of an ancient red-marble statue unear­thed at Hadrian’s Villa in 1736 and enshrined at the Capi­to­line Museum.

Abstract, Zooming In: The Social Lives of Statues

In 1976, Carlo Ginz­burg pioneered micro­history with his Il form­aggio e i vermi; a decade later, Arjun Appadurai’s 1986 antho­logy The Social Lives of Things included Igor Kopytoff’s influ­en­tial essay “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commo­di­tiza­tion as Process.” Halfway between them, Taste and the Antique applied similar scru­tiny to the lives and after­lives of clas­sical sculp­tures, inves­ti­ga­ting each “as a cultu­rally cons­tructed entity, endowed with cultu­rally specific meanings, and clas­si­fied and reclas­si­fied into cultu­rally consti­tuted cate­go­ries” [Kopy­toff, 68]. Embra­cing that insight, this talk inves­ti­gates two fraught but telling moments for Haskell and Penny’s sculp­tural canon: the alleged kidnap­ping of the Dying Gaul (cat. 44) by Don Livio Odes­calchi  in 1689 and the rivalry between Marchese Capponi and Monsi­gnor Furi­etti over theFaun in Rosso Antico (cat. 39) and Centaurs (cat. 20) around 1740. Momen­tous but never fully untan­gled, these episodes suggest the conti­nuing possi­bi­li­ties of pursuing macro­scopic trends through micro­scopic investigations.

 

ANNA DEGLER (Kunst­his­to­ri­sches Institut, Freie Univer­sität Berlin) 

Bio: Anna Degler is rese­arch asso­ciate in art history at Freie Univer­sität Berlin. She curr­ently is prin­cipal inves­ti­gator of the rese­arch project “The Eternal Belve­dere Torso: The Mate­ria­lity and Tempo­ra­lity of Cano­niza­tion” (funded by the German Rese­arch Foun­da­tion since 2025). Her rese­arch focuses on early modern Euro­pean art with parti­cular emphasis on the history of ideas, canon forma­tion prac­tices and materiality.

She is the author of Parergon. Attribut, Mate­rial und Frag­ment in der Bild­äs­thetik des Quat­tro­cento (Fink, 2015).

Abstract, A Black Apollo? John Quincy Adams Ward’s The Freedman and the Belve­dere Torso

The paper inves­ti­gates clas­sical recep­tion at the inter­sec­tion of educa­tion, class and race in the United States. Depar­ting from J.Q.A. Ward’s sculp­ture The Freedman (1863), which draws inspi­ra­tion from the Belve­dere Torso, it asks how artists reworked clas­sical heri­tage and the canon in the so-called ‘New World’ within the context of social debates. It analyses the impact of Greco-Roman anti­quity on the artistic, histo­rical as well as on the subse­quent scho­larly discourse. Both strands are connected by a decided search for ‘Ameri­can­ness’. To this end, the paper discusses concepts of freedom, mascu­li­nity and the idea­lised strong body that have been tied to the Belve­dere Torso against the back­drop of U.S.-American anti­quity recep­tion and abolitionism.

It finally traces the histo­rical imagi­na­tion of a Black Apollo and thus seeks to recon­sider both, the depic­tion of margi­na­lized groups in U.S. clas­sical recep­tion and the unab­ated importance of the Belve­dere Torso in the canon.

 

EVA EHNINGER (Institut für Kunst- und Bild­ge­schichte, Humboldt-Univer­sität zu Berlin)

Bio:  Eva Ehninger is Professor of Modern Art History at the Insti­tute of Art and Visual History, Humboldt-Univer­sität zu Berlin. Since January 2024 she has co-directed, toge­ther with Sharon Macdo­nald, the newly founded Centre for Advanced Study inherit. heri­tage in trans­for­ma­tion (inherit.hu-berlin.de). In her scho­lar­ship she studies the transfer of heri­tage into, and by means of, diffe­rent media, its disse­mi­na­tion in varied histo­rical and cultural contexts, and changes of meaning and value that are based on these trans­for­ma­tions. In her current rese­arch project, Art Educa­tion between Heri­tage Making and Critical Trans­re­gio­na­lity (funded by the Federal Ministry of Educa­tion and Rese­arch, Germany) she studies concep­tions of art and aesthetic educa­tion in colo­nial, post­co­lo­nial, national and trans­cul­tural contexts, with a geogra­phical focus on India

Abstract, The Bodies of Gods. Drawing from the Antique in Colo­nial India

During the second half of the 19th century the British colo­nial admi­nis­tra­tion founded four schools of applied art in the cities of Madras, Calcutta (Kolkata), Bombay (Mumbai) and Lahore. The curri­culum of the schools was based on the “South Kensington System” of art educa­tion, deve­loped by the British Depart­ment of Science and Art in the early 1850s. The South Kensington System promoted the skill of drawing as an essen­tial basis for artistic educa­tion, and plaster casts of antique sculp­tures were considered a neces­sary teaching aid. Students would learn shading and perspec­tive by drawing these casts, and also inter­na­lize the aesthetic para­digm of Greek anti­quity. In the context of colo­nial educa­tional policy in India, Greek anti­quity was unders­tood as a means to educate Indians in taste, and to trans­form them into modern, enligh­tened, upright subjects of the British Empire.

The imple­men­ta­tion of this curri­culum had an unwanted side effect, however. The fore­groun­ding of anti­quity as an aesthetic model even­tually led to a streng­thened appre­cia­tion of Indian anti­quity as well. The recep­tion of this anti­quity fore­grounded an enti­rely diffe­rent ideal of the human body, which was achieved with a diffe­rent, linear style of drawing as well. In my talk, I will discuss how the idea of a national Indian iden­tity, as part of India’s move toward inde­pen­dence, was addressed within the very act of drawing these diffe­rent antiquities.

 

ASTRID FENDT (Landes­mu­seum Würt­tem­berg, Stuttgart)

Bio: Dr Astrid Fendt is a clas­sical archaeo­lo­gist. She heads the archaeo­logy depart­ment at Landes­mu­seum Würt­tem­berg in Stutt­gart (Germany). Her areas of exper­tise are Greek and Roman sculp­ture, ancient jewelry and textiles, recep­tion and resto­ra­tion of anti­qui­ties. From 2012 to 2023 she was senior curator at Staat­liche Anti­ken­samm­lungen and Glyp­to­thek in Munich. Before she was a rese­arch assistant at Anti­ken­samm­lung Staat­liche Museen zu Berlin in the project “Berlin Sculp­ture Network –Contex­tua­liza­tion and Trans­la­tion of Ancient Sculpture”.

Abstract, Resto­ra­tion, De- and Re-resto­ra­tion of Ancient Sculp­tures in the Munich Glyp­to­thek, Nine­te­enth to Twenty-First Century

Resto­ra­tion, de-resto­ra­tion and re-resto­ra­tion – these diffe­rent concepts in dealing with ancient marble sculp­tures can be traced very well in the Glyp­to­thek in Munich over a period of 200 years. The focus of this lecture is on the 20th century. In the 1960s there was a radical and compre­hen­sive de-resto­ra­tion campaign. It is clearly to be unders­tood in the context of the long resto­ra­tion debates of the 19th century and the modern art move­ments after the Second World War. Viru­lent was the discus­sion about the de-resto­ra­tion of the famous Barbe­rini Faun. It concerned mainly body-poli­tical and aesthetic reasons and took place between clas­sical archaeo­lo­gists and art historians.

Curr­ently, re-resto­ra­tions are taking place on selected figures. They testify to a new approach to the resto­ra­tion of ancient sculp­tures based on an appre­cia­tion of the various histo­rical layers inherent in restored marble sculptures.

 

ELEO­NORA FERRAZZA (Depart­ment of Greek and Roman Anti­qui­ties, Vatican Museums) 

Bio: Holding a PhD and MA in Clas­sical Archaeo­logy, since 2009 Eleo­nora Ferrazza has been Assistant Curator in the Greek and Roman Anti­qui­ties Depart­ment of the Vatican Museums, where she has carried out rese­arch on clas­sical sculp­tures: the disco­very of the Apollo Belve­dere; the resto­ra­tion of the porphyry sarco­phagus of St. Helena; case studies on the use of marble in rela­tion to icono­graphy and ancient work­man­ship, on the inspi­ra­tion from the Antique, on the papal anti­qui­ties coll­ec­tions in the early 19th century. She also works on the funerary archaeo­logy in the Necro­polis along the Via Triumphalis.

Abstract, The Braccio Nuovo in the Vatican Museums: Display and Resto­ra­tions of the Antique in the Nine­te­enth Century 

The paper will consider the Braccio Nuovo, inau­gu­rated in 1822. The theo­re­tical concep­tion of this modern museum buil­ding that adapted to the anti­qui­ties on display, and not vice versa, can be traced back to Antonio Canova. Further­more, it is possible to assign to Antonio D’Este the opera­tional role in the setting up of the sculp­tures and the deco­ra­tive appa­ratus through an analysis of archive docu­ments and drawings by archi­tect Raffaele Stern. The sculp­tures came from the coll­ec­tions of Rome’s noble fami­lies and from various excava­tions; they ther­e­fore presented very diffe­rent conser­va­tion condi­tions, which at the time were sought to be over­come in the perspec­tive of aesthetic homo­gen­eity. The recent resto­ra­tion of the entire sculp­tural appa­ratus offers a broad view of the diffe­rent methods of inter­ven­tion: the respect for the 16th–17th-century addi­tions; the late 18th-century inter­ven­tions on the acquired sculp­tures ready for exhi­bi­tion; the prac­tice followed to perfect the 1822 display.

 

JOANNA FIDUCCIA (Depart­ment of History of Art, Yale University)

Bio: Joanna Fiduccia is assistant professor of the History of Art at Yale Univer­sity, where she specia­lizes in modern Euro­pean art and the histo­rical avant-garde. Her rese­arch explores the rela­ti­onship between aesthetic forms and poli­tical forma­tions, particularly​ the nation, through the history of modern sculp­ture and expe­ri­mental art prac­tices. Her first book, Figures of Crisis: Alberto Giaco­metti and the Myths of Natio­na­lism, will be published with Yale Univer­sity Press in March 2026. She is curr­ently working on a study of the evol­ving rela­ti­onship between auto­ma­tism and poli­tical sovereignty.

Abstract, The Head of an Etru­scan: Alter­na­tive Anti­qui­ties and the Physio­gno­mies of Modern Sculpture

In the interwar period, Italian and German anthro­po­lo­gists awakened a slee­ping subject: the so-called “mystery of the Etru­scans,” or the geogra­phic origins of the civi­liza­tion behind the arres­t­ingly natu­ra­li­stic sculp­tures disco­vered in archaeo­lo­gical sites in present-day Tuscany and portions of Umbria and Lazio. Debates about those origins became the staging grounds for the Pact of Steel’s racial poli­tics, as fanta­sies of an auto­cht­ho­nous Euro­pean race coll­ided with orien­ta­list fables of routed foreign influence.

In artistic circles, a growing inte­rest in Etru­scan anti­quity over Greco-Roman statuary paral­leled the Etrus­co­lo­gists’ tenden­tious search for sculp­tural evidence of the Etruscan’s true face. Notably, Alberto Giaco­metti and Marino Marini embarked in those same years upon projects of portrai­ture that sought to remake the terms of sculp­tural resem­blance by clai­ming an alter­na­tive sculp­tural canon: the Etru­scan origins of their poly­chro­matic figu­ra­tive plas­ters, whose formal insta­bi­lity reflected the poli­tical vola­ti­lity and ambi­guous racia­li­sa­tion of the Etruscan.

 

CLARE HORNSBY (British School at Rome – The Walpole Society) 

Bio: Clare Hornsby is an art and archi­tec­tural histo­rian who has published books on the Grand Tour, the anti­qui­ties market and on eigh­te­enth-century archi­tec­ture. Since 2020 her work has concen­trated on Giovanni Battista Pira­nesi; a recent article for the Papers of the British School at Rome focussed on the newly-disco­vered first state of Piranesi’s famous Campo Marzio map. She is a Rese­arch Fellow at the British School at Rome, a member of the Scien­tific Commit­tees of Studi sul Sette­cento Romano and of the Edizione Nazio­nale delle Opere di Giovanni Battista Pira­nesi and Chair­woman of The Walpole Society.

Abstract, Pira­nesi and the Clas­sical Body

In the final para­graphs of his “Ragio­na­mento Apolo­ge­tico”, published as a three-language parallel text preface to the prints of his 1769 illus­trated book Diverse Maniere d’adornare i cammini, Giovanni Battista Pira­nesi and his scho­larly colla­bo­rator the Jesuit theo­lo­gian and anti­qua­rian Gaspare Luigi Oderico make an extra­or­di­nary digres­sion from the themes with which that essay was concerned, namely an apologia of Egyp­tian archi­tec­tural, deco­ra­tive and sculp­tural forms, a hypo­thesis regar­ding the deri­va­tion of forms of Greek vases (then referred to as Etru­scan) from the natural world, speci­fi­cally shells and an explo­ra­tion of Etru­scan art, archi­tec­ture, and design. For the only time in the whole of his published works, in these para­graphs Pira­nesi refers to the canon of clas­sical form in the repre­sen­ta­tion of the human body, with specific refe­rence to the repre­sen­ta­tion of the body of Christ. This paper will examine his state­ments in their art histo­rical context and look at the way in which, set within the “Ragio­na­mento”, he proposes a hier­archy of form for the human body, placing the “Roman school” in contrast to the trans­gres­sive or archaic forms of the body as seen in Egyp­tian sculp­ture, on display in many of the chim­ney­piece designs in the volume.

 

MATEUSZ KAPUSTKA (Art History Insti­tute – Univer­sity of Zurich)

Bio: Mateusz Kapustka (ORCID: 0009–0007-6273–7314) is a Privat­do­zent at the Art History Insti­tute of the Univer­sity of Zurich and the PI of a DFG rese­arch project at the FU Berlin; from 2013 to 2023 he was visiting/interim professor at univer­si­ties in Zurich, Frankfurt/Main, Berlin (FU, HU), and Poznań (UAM), also teaching in São Paulo (Unifesp) and New Delhi (NMI); rese­arch inte­rests: image conflicts, visual anachro­nism, idolatry/iconoclasm; early modern inter­sec­tions of know­ledge and visual propaganda.

 

Abstract, Fear Reve­aled: Jacob Burck­hardt on Clas­sical Anthro­po­mor­phism and Demonic Hybridity

This paper explores Jacob Burckhardt’s comm­ents on the demo­ni­sa­tion of Helle­ni­stic culture. His early work, The Age of Constan­tine the Great (1852/53) promin­ently features this concept of histo­rical decline located in the conflict between Clas­sical anthro­po­mor­phic gods and Helle­ni­stic hybrid demons.

Accor­ding to Burckhardt’s “mythistory”, in the Helle­ni­stic 3rd century, the nexus of exis­ten­tial fear and aesthetic, hitherto provided with the cano­nical beauty of the Hellenic gods, collapsed:

their anthro­po­mor­phic statues could no longer convey the terri­fying aspects of fate towards the new hybrid, compo­site images of Orphic demons. The Constan­ti­nian icono­clasm was thus, for Burck­hardt, a perspi­cuously palpable response to the anxiety evoked by the undis­gu­i­sed­ness of Helle­ni­stic magic. The paper seeks to dialec­ti­cally inves­ti­gate, from today’s trans­cul­tural perspec­tive, how this bias precon­di­tioned Burckhardt’s estab­lish­ment of the ideal of clas­sical taste in his lectures on “The Greeks and Greek Civi­li­sa­tion” (1872, published post­hu­mously in 1898/1902) and his view of the Renais­sance (1860 and 1878).

 

ANNETTE KRANEN (Institut für Kunst­ge­schichte  Univer­sität Bern)

Bio: Annette Kranen is an art histo­rian specia­li­zing in the fields of mobi­lity, the recep­tion of anti­quity, and concepts of land­scape in early moder­nity. She gained her doctoral degree from the Freie Univer­sität Berlin in 2018 and teaches at the Insti­tute of Art History of the Univer­sity of Bern since 2019. She is a co-founder of the Network Topo­gra­phic Visual Media, a plat­form for the exch­ange between scho­lars working on topo­gra­phic visualizations.

Abstract, Living Anti­qui­ties? Travel Imagery and the Sculp­tural Canon in the Late 18th Century

During the late 18th century, the body image of ancient sculp­ture, unders­tood as a norma­tive ideal, played a crucial role in the nascent science of anthro­po­logy. The Anthro­po­lo­gist Pieter Camper, for example, used the Apollo of Belve­dere as a point of refe­rence for anato­mical compa­ri­sons. Travel imagery featured icono­gra­phic allu­sions to ancient sculp­tures as well, for instance the prints and pain­tings by artists who had travelled with James Cook. This model­ling of indi­ge­nous bodies after cano­nical antique sculp­tures is more than just an academic conven­tion. It engen­ders conno­ta­tions on the biolo­gical and cultural character of the depicted people and reveals contra­dic­tions that arose from the intert­wi­ning of anthro­po­logy and aesthe­tics. The paper will thus explore how this aspect of travel imagery shaped modern notions of the “other” and shed light on the role of the sculp­tural canon in discourses of travel, explo­ra­tion, and anthro­po­logy around 1800.

 

NICHOLAS PENNY (Former Director, National Gallery, London)

Bio: After teaching art history at the Univer­sity of Manchester, Nicholas Penny occu­pied cura­to­rial posi­tions in the Ashmo­lean Museum, the National Gallery and the National Gallery of Art. From 2008 to 2015 he was Director of the National Gallery.

He is now a visi­ting professor at the National Academy of Fine Art in Hang­zhou. His books include Taste and the Antique (toge­ther with the late Francis Haskell – 1981) which has recently reap­peared in a revised and ampli­fied edition by Adriano Aymo­nino and Eloisa Dodero, also Raphael (toge­ther with the late Roger Jones – 1983) and The Mate­rials of Sculp­ture (1993). His cata­lo­gues of the sculp­ture in the Ashmo­lean Museum (3 vols, 1992) and of the sixte­enth-century Italian pain­tings in the National Gallery (2004, 2008, 2016) give unusual atten­tion to the history of coll­ec­ting and taste, as do the volumes he is writing for the Norton Simon Museum. One of the latter was published in 2021 and the other, written with Imogen Tedbury, is approa­ching completion.

Abstract, The Inven­tion of the Classical

The lecture will explore how the Antique was re-clas­si­fied as the Clas­sical in the late nine­te­enth century and how that latter term was also employed to define a styli­stic episode with strict chro­no­lo­gical boun­da­ries within the history of ancient Greek art. At the same time art histo­rians who detached them­selves from the study of ancient Greek and Roman art, and leading connois­seurs who ignored it, also strove to define an equi­va­lent episode during the Renaissance.

 

KATHA­RINE A. RAFF (Depart­ment of Arts of Greece, Rome, and Byzan­tium, Art Insti­tute of Chicago)

Bio: Katha­rine A. Raff is Eliza­beth McIl­vaine Curator, Arts of Greece, Rome, and Byzan­tium, at the Art Insti­tute of Chicago, where she has worked since 2011. Her recent projects include the reinstal­la­tion of the Art Institute’s perma­nent gallery of Roman art (2024); Coll­ec­ting Stories, an instal­la­tion on ancient artworks and their modern after­lives (2019); and the digital scho­larly cata­logue Roman Art at the Art Insti­tute of Chicago (2017), for which she served as primary author and editor.

 

Abstract, Reve­aling Resto­ra­tions: Asses­sing the Presen­ta­tion and Recep­tion of Restored Roman Sculp­tures from the Torlonia Coll­ec­tion at the Art Insti­tute of Chicago

In this paper, we address how the recent exhi­bi­tion of a selec­tion of fifty-eight ancient sculp­tures from the Torlonia Coll­ec­tion has radi­cally changed the way that we, as scho­lars of Greek and Roman art, have come to under­stand, inter­pret, and present later historic resto­ra­tions in museum settings. To unders­core the role of these resto­ra­tions in alte­ring the appearance of the ancient sculp­ture (or frag­ment of a sculp­ture), working in consul­ta­tion and colla­bo­ra­tion with the Torlonia Foun­da­tion, we included a conser­va­tion diagram for every object on display in the exhi­bi­tion. These diagrams effi­ci­ently and clearly illus­trated both the ancient and restored parts of each object in a format acces­sible to general audi­ences. The inclu­sion of the diagrams both promoted visi­tors’ close looking and enga­ge­ment with the objects and shaped how we as scho­lars talk about, present, and evaluate ancient Roman sculp­tures within the context of major public art museums.

  

TILMAN SCHREIBER (Depart­ment of Art History and Film Studies – Fried­rich Schiller Univer­sity Jena)

Bio: Tilman Schreiber studied Art History, Film Studies, and German Lite­rary Studies at the Univer­sity of Jena, the Univer­sité Paris I – Panthéon-Sorbonne, and the Univer­sità di Roma – La Sapi­enza (2012–2019). Since October 2020, he has been working on a doctoral thesis dealing with the produc­tion of (neo-)classical images in Europe between 1690 and 1820. This inte­rest is accom­pa­nied by a focus on ‘(Neo-)Classicism’ as an art histo­rical heuristic.

Abstract, From the Cortile to the Cosmos: Inter­pre­ting the Sculp­tural Canon in the Context of US Space Travel

Refe­rences to the art and culture of anti­quity have pervaded the history of US space travel since its begin­nings. They not only charac­te­rize the choice of mission names (such as Project Mercury) and the naming of command modules (such as Odyssey), but they have also shaped the design of the emblems created for each NASA mission. A promi­nent example in this context is the logo design for Apollo 17 (1972), which the U.S. space agency entrusted to the painter and graphic artist Robert McCall. The Apollo of Belve­dere, one of the most famous ancient sculp­tures of all time, forms the motivic anchor point of McCall’s design. This design decision is at the centre of my paper. On the one hand, it examines the adapt­a­tion of the Apollo in the context of McCall’s oeuvre. On the other, it addresses the ques­tion of what func­tion the refe­rence to one of the central sculp­tures of the art-histo­rical canon serves in the self-inter­pre­ta­tion of American space travel.

 

DOMI­ZIANA SERRANO (Institut ARTS, Univer­sité Jean Monnet – Saint-Étienne) 

Bio: Domi­ziana Serrano is a PhD candi­date in Contem­po­rary Art History at Univer­sité Jean Monnet — Saint-Étienne (France). Her doctoral rese­arch explores surrea­list sculp­ture, with parti­cular atten­tion to its mate­rial prac­tices and concep­tual limits, adop­ting femi­nist and post­co­lo­nial metho­do­lo­gies to chall­enge and reframe Surrea­lism beyond a narrowly Western-centric para­digm. Her forth­co­ming publi­ca­tions will appear in late 2025 in the Inter­na­tional Journal of Surrea­lism and as part of the Trans­at­lantic Cultures project.

Abstract, The Frag­mented Marble Body: Surrea­lism, Poli­tical Phan­toms, and the Canon Recast

This contri­bu­tion eluci­dates the mani­fold moda­li­ties through which the clas­sical sculp­tural canon has been reinter­preted within the hete­ro­ge­neous produc­tion of the surrea­list move­ment. While Surrealism’s preoc­cu­pa­tion with the so-called “primi­tive” has garnered sustained critical atten­tion, the movement’s complex and ambi­va­lent enga­ge­ment with the visual and ideo­lo­gical lega­cies of clas­sical anti­quity has remained conspi­cuously under-theo­rised.  Through a combined analysis of textual sources and visual mate­rial, this inquiry seeks to address this lacuna by brin­ging into relief both mani­fest and latent presences of Greco-Roman statuary within surrea­list discourse and practice.

By inter­ro­ga­ting the body as a site of re/deconstructed meaning, the clas­sical form now frag­mented and altered, as evident in the itera­tions of the Venus de Milo reim­agined by Dalí, Magritte, and Man Ray, emerges as a “New Canon.”

Such rewor­kings may also be read as a poli­tical commen­tary on the racia­lised impli­ca­tions of contem­po­ra­neous fascist appro­pria­tion of the clas­sical tradition.

 

SALVA­TORE SETTIS (Acca­de­mico dei Lincei)

Bio: Salva­tore Settis has been Director of the Getty Rese­arch Insti­tute, Los Angeles (1994–1999) and of the Scuola Normale Supe­riore di Pisa (1999–2010). He chaired the High Council for Cultural Heri­tage of Italy (2007–2009) and the Scien­tific Council of the Musée du Louvre (2010–2023), has been Warburg Professor at the Univer­sity of Hamburg, and deli­vered the Isaiah Berlin Lectures at Oxford, the Mellon Lectures at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, the Lectures of the Cátedra del Museo del Prado in Madrid, and the Borro­mini Lectures at the Univer­sità della Sviz­zera Italiana. His rese­arch inte­rests include Clas­sical Archaeo­logy, Renais­sance Art History, and the preser­va­tion of land­scape and cultural heri­tage. He has curated exhi­bi­tions such as Serial/Portable Classic, Prada Foun­da­tion, Milan and Venice 2015; The Torlonia Marbles, Rome, Capi­to­line Museums, 2020–21, Milan, Gallerie d’Italia in Piazza della Scala, 2022, and Paris, Louvre, 2024; Recy­cling Beauty, Milan, Prada Foun­da­tion, 2022–2023.

Abstract, Only Connect: Dionysus and Christ

Connec­ting Clas­sical “sources” (texts and depic­tions) to post-antique works and authors is both a philo­lo­gical and morpho­lo­gical opera­tion, and no intellec­tual under­ta­king of the 20th century shows this better than the Mnemo­syne Atlas, Aby Warburg’s unfi­nished work. The Pathos­for­meln conveyed from Roman sarco­phagi to Chris­tian icono­graphy, such as The Maenad under the Cross noted by Edgar Wind and Frede­rick Antal, are a parti­cu­larly eloquent example. But while the ‘etymo­lo­gical’ connec­tion calls for a rational and histo­rical expl­ana­tion, morpho­lo­gical simi­la­ri­ties may lead us to explore intui­tive, emotional, and some­times meta­cul­tural aspects. Much less observed is another family of inter­con­nec­tions between ancient and post-ancient lite­rary and visual languages, which also has to do with the rese­arch proto­cols of various disci­plines: namely, the rare and ther­e­fore even more signi­fi­cant conver­gence between morpho­lo­gical simi­la­ri­ties in texts and those in images (formulas and gestures). This paper will focus on the morpho­lo­gical, func­tional, and histo­rical simi­la­ri­ties between Diony­sian ecstasy and its excesses on the one hand, and the Passion of Christ on the other, along a path that will include both texts and images without ranking them in order of significance.

 

CLAUDIA VALERI (Depart­ment of Greek and Roman Anti­qui­ties, Vatican Museums) 

Bio: Holding a PhD in Clas­sical Archaeo­logy, Claudia Valeri was hired in 2007 by the Vatican Museums as Assistant Curator in the Greek and Roman Anti­qui­ties Depart­ment, of which she has been Chief Curator since 2023.

Publi­ca­tions range from ancient sculp­ture in context to rese­arch on the history of archaeo­logy and collecting.She is curr­ently Socio Ordi­nario of the National Insti­tute of Archaeo­logy and Art History, Socio Corrispon­dente of the German Archaeo­lo­gical Insti­tute and of the Ponti­fical Roman Academy of Archaeology.

Abstract, The Braccio Nuovo in the Vatican Museums: Display and Resto­ra­tions of the Antique in the Nine­te­enth century 

The paper will consider the Braccio Nuovo, inau­gu­rated in 1822. The theo­re­tical concep­tion of this modern museum buil­ding that adapted to the anti­qui­ties on display, and not vice versa, can be traced back to Antonio Canova. Further­more, it is possible to assign to Antonio D’Este the opera­tional role in the setting up of the sculp­tures and the deco­ra­tive appa­ratus through an analysis of archive docu­ments and drawings by archi­tect Raffaele Stern. The sculp­tures came from the coll­ec­tions of Rome’s noble fami­lies and from various excava­tions; they ther­e­fore presented very diffe­rent conser­va­tion condi­tions, which at the time were sought to be over­come in the perspec­tive of aesthetic homo­gen­eity. The recent resto­ra­tion of the entire sculp­tural appa­ratus offers a broad view of the diffe­rent methods of inter­ven­tion: the respect for the 16th-17th-century addi­tions; the late 18th-century inter­ven­tions on the acquired sculp­tures ready for exhi­bi­tion; the prac­tice followed to perfect the 1822 display.

 

REBECCA YUSTE (Depart­ment of Art History & Archaeo­logy, Columbia University) 

Bio: Rebecca Yuste is an art and archi­tec­tural histo­rian, comple­ting a PhD at Columbia Univer­sity, and a Junior Fellow at Dumbarton Oaks, Harvard Univer­sity. Her disser­ta­tion is an archi­tec­tural and land­scape history of late-Bourbon Mexico City. She is inte­rested in the history of garden design, Enligh­ten­ment city plan­ning, and the lega­cies of the clas­sical world in Latin America. She is the co-founder of the Global Neoclas­si­cism Project, which she laun­ched in 2024. Her rese­arch has been supported by the Hispanic Society of America, the Society of Archi­tec­tural Histo­rians, the Deco­ra­tive Arts Trust, and the Temple Hoyne Buell Center for American Archi­tec­ture. 

Abstract, Between Plaster and Stone: Reframing the Clas­sical Canon in Bourbon New Spain

In July 1791, the Valen­cian sculptor Manuel Tolsá arrived in Mexico City, brin­ging with him books, instru­ments, and over sixty crates of plaster casts destined for the newly-founded Royal Academy of San Carlos. These casts were intended to estab­lish a canon of clas­sical forms to train colo­nial artists in the aesthe­tics of Western Europe. Yet just months earlier, the 1790 uneart­hing of the Aztec Sun Stone in the city’s main square had unsettled the very idea of anti­quity in New Spain. This paper examines how Greco-Roman and pre-Colum­bian aesthe­tics vied for autho­rity within the colo­nial imagi­na­tion, and how the Academy’s imported canon was desta­bi­lized by the monu­mental presence of indi­ge­nous anti­quity. In this contested visual and intellec­tual land­scape, anti­quity was not a stable inhe­ri­tance, but a site of nego­tia­tion, rede­fi­ni­tion, and resis­tance within the cultural poli­tics of late Bourbon empire.